The sole aim seems to be that of knocking the stuffing out of the middle class.
Existentialists self-reflectively see life as consisting of slices of existence which must be intertwined somewhat artificially, dialectically, into an essential home.
The middle class is passive-aggressive, fractured. It will always attempt to synchronize with the other and re-look at it, to be there in trying to synchronize and be prepared to synchronize, which is the realm of normality, however not the realm of intensified self.
The intellectual is always one or two or three thoughts away from saving the human race from itself.
Thinking of something important this morning: the nature of the word or the fractured element, or of course really the fractured elements, because the word commences with the plural.
Emphasizing the above point, a conversation is not communication in the primary sense but rather self-annihilation with an assumption of self-reflection.
The essence of this self-reflection is the core philosophical thread of reality, which we must perceive and visit, often making it religiosity.
The eradication of personality and the movement towards synchronization, coding, expansionism, and control.
Just thinking along the lines of the ego: this collection of transient states, however, in its totality, is the ability and motivating force to carry out desires to achieve the desired state.
The most extraordinary thing is to be conscious of one’s own consciousness.
Absolutely critical point: the nature of conflict, the military, the mother-son bond, and the army of KKK minus 1K at the end of history. We are surrounded!
So it seems that creative people cannot stomach the existence of the other; hell is the other.
What about stability?
Synchronization is no less the annihilation of contradiction itself; totality subsumes partiality. Dialectical consciousness.
The negativity of consciousness is subsumed with the idea of the necessity of holding up the universe.
The working class create unity in the realm of the body: absolute reactivity.
The aristocratic class create unity as dialectical.
The middle class, of course, develop passive-aggressive tendencies: percussive unity or disjunctive unity.
We are now in an artificial vertical war, as opposed to traditional horizontal warfare.
It has to be realized that civilization is a matriarchal complex situation.
Self-evidently, winning history is, to all intents and purposes, the booby prize.
The aim is to endlessly lose history and re-participate in the eternal return so that the human is never submitted.
Fascinated by the idea of the middle class and their passive-aggressive nature.
In addition, the extension of conjoining between the genders creates the essence of the matriarchal society.
So we cannot structure the next thought.
The insidious nature of the construction begins to reveal itself, and that your faith.
It is the unity of thought and purpose that is the reality of consciousness.
Essentially, conflict is a subroutine of life.
Of course, if you win history – so-called – you actually are the first to reach stasis. This means you are linked to the most passive-aggressive middle class, the most self-referential, nerd group or grouping or group page. Then you get the car, and males rapidly lose novelty value from the perspective of the woman who achieves self-referential meltdown.
The middle class, the passive-aggressive centralized layer of any society, do not engage in any metaphysical speculation.
The working class, of course, see these metaphysical approaches as a ridiculous process or project deeper meaning onto it.
Of course, the upper class, the aristocratic class, see the rituals as hollow, manipulate, or totally alter them as they see fit.